Pine Bark Extract and Vitamin C: what the published research says
PubMed indexes 6 records that name Pine Bark Extract and Vitamin C together, either in the title or in an interaction, co-administration, or pharmacokinetic context. Each one is listed below with its study design and, where the abstract states one, the authors’ own conclusion, quoted and linked. This page reports that literature. It does not tell you whether to combine them.
Every statement below is attributed to a named, dated, linked source.
This page lists published research relevant to Pine Bark Extract and Vitamin C. It deliberately does not state whether the combination is safe, whether it interacts, in which direction, at what dose, or how far apart to take them.
A study appearing here is not proof that an interaction exists. Two substances can be named together in a paper that never tested them in combination, and a source listed as background may cover only one of them.
Findings are quoted from each abstract as the authors wrote them. NutriStack has not re-analysed, pooled, or reconciled them, and they may disagree with each other.
NutriStack’s own interaction assessment for this pair is not published here. It has not completed qualified-human clinical review, so it is withheld from search. See the publication gate.
Nothing here is medical advice. Decisions about prescription medication and supplements belong with your prescriber or pharmacist, who can see your full regimen.
The research
6 studies naming Pine Bark Extract and Vitamin C.
Strongest relevance first: papers naming both substances in the title, then human trials and systematic reviews.
Journal of the American Dietetic Association · 2003 · PMID 12525796
Clinical TrialControlled Clinical Trial
“The present findings fail to support the vitamin C or antioxidant claims made for PYC. PYC does not impact the antioxidant or vitamin C status of healthy young adults.”
Names both Pine Bark Extract and Vitamin C in its title.
Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2022 · PMID 35150043
Human subjects
“The tested serum is effective in protecting human skin ex vivo against air pollution-induced skin pigmentation/aging and reduced in vivo skin aging signs, with a good safety profile after 90 days of daily use.”
Names both Pine Bark Extract and Vitamin C in its title.
“Oral administration of the antioxidant mixture significantly inhibited wrinkle formation caused by chronic UVB irradiation through significant inhibition of UVB-induced MMP activity accompanied by enhancement of collagen synthesis.”
Names both Pine Bark Extract and Vitamin C in its title.
General physiology and biophysics · 2006 · PMID 17356231
“PYC s inhibitory effect on formation of carbonyl compounds in BSA and plasma proteins, oxidized by two oxidative systems--H2O2/FeSO4 and HOCl, were studied in co-operation with other synthetic antioxidants--ascorbic acid and trolox. We found the synergistic or additive effect of PYC with mentioned antioxidants.”
Names both Pine Bark Extract and Vitamin C in its title.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2001 · PMID 11795436
Comparative StudyAnimal study
“The antioxidant activity of TNJ was compared to the effects of vitamin C, grape seed powder (GSP), and pycnogenol (PYC) at the daily dose per serving level recommended by U.S.RDAs or manufacturers. The results suggest that prevention of carcinogen-DNA adduct formation and the antioxidant activity of TNJ may contribute to the cancer preventive effect of Morinda citrifolia.”
Names Pine Bark Extract and Vitamin C together in an interaction, co-administration, or pharmacokinetic context.
Limitations
What this evidence cannot tell you.
Search-based evidence indexes have real limits, and it is worth being explicit about them:
Selection. These records were found by searching PubMed titles and abstracts for both substance names alongside interaction and pharmacokinetic terms. Relevant work that phrases things differently, or is not indexed in PubMed, will be missing.
No effect size. The quoted conclusions are the authors’ words about their own study. We have not extracted effect direction or magnitude, and a single study’s conclusion is not a consensus.
Population mismatch. Findings in healthy volunteers, animals, or a specific patient group may not transfer to you, your dose, or your formulation.
Absence is not safety. Few published studies means the combination is under-studied, which is not the same as established as safe.
Nearby evidence
Other pairs with published research.
Pages covering Pine Bark Extract or Vitamin C alongside a different substance.
NutriStack is a free iPhone app for organising a supplement routine: what you take, when, and what the published record says about it. Its exploratory interaction checker covers Pine Bark Extract, Vitamin C, and several hundred other substances.
The checker is a research and organisation tool, not a clinical decision aid, and its per-pair assessments are excluded from search until they pass claim-level review.
NutriStack is an informational and organizational tool, not a medical service, and not a substitute for professional advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before starting, stopping, or changing any supplement or medication.