NutriStack data reportEvidence gap 2026Data harvested 2026-08-01

Most supplement combinations have barely been studied.

We ran a relevance-filtered PubMed search for every one of the 2,517 supplement and supplement-drug pairs in the NutriStack database. For 795 pairs (31.6%), PubMed holds no record that names both substances in an interaction context. 1,399 (55.6%) have fewer than five. The full table, query and method are below, free to reuse.

Findings

The headline numbers.

Counts are PubMed records that name both members of a pair, found with the query described in the method. A record is evidence that someone studied or discussed the two together, not that they interact.

Summary

MeasureValue
Pairs searched2,517
Supplement + prescription pairs1,445
Supplement + supplement pairs1,072
Pairs with zero qualifying PubMed records795 (31.6%)
Pairs with fewer than two records1,036 (41.2%)
Pairs with fewer than five records1,399 (55.6%)
Pairs with at least one clinical trial listed730 (29.0%)

Where the complete record lists show it

  • For the 1,901 pairs with 20 or fewer records, we reviewed every record's PubMed publication type and MeSH tags. 1,263 of them (66.4%) have no human study naming both.
  • 1,527 (80.3%) have no clinical trial of any kind.
  • Pairs with more than 20 records were not counted here, because the harvest stored only the first 20 records for each pair.

Distribution

Supplement and drug pairs are the least studied.

The gap is widest exactly where the stakes are highest: a supplement taken alongside a prescription medicine.

PubMed records per pair

RecordsSupplement + prescriptionSupplement + supplement
0 records493 (34.1%)302 (28.2%)
1 record151 (10.4%)90 (8.4%)
2-4 records217 (15.0%)146 (13.6%)
5-19 records284 (19.7%)194 (18.1%)
20+ records300 (20.8%)340 (31.7%)

The form gap

Research names the mineral. Shops sell the form.

The substances with the largest share of unstudied pairs are mostly specific salt forms, such as magnesium glycinate, taurate, malate and threonate. These are the forms most heavily marketed online, and PubMed research almost never names them in a combination.

Largest share of pairs with zero records (substances in 15 or more pairs)

SubstancePairsPairs with zero recordsShare
Magnesium Glycinate989394.9%
Magnesium Taurate171694.1%
Magnesium Malate161593.8%
Magnesium L-Threonate151493.3%
Berberine HCl161487.5%
Iron Bisglycinate171270.6%
Magnesium Citrate271970.4%
L-Theanine422969.0%
L-Citrulline322268.8%
Psyllium Husk352468.6%
Nattokinase221568.2%
Valerian Root16956.2%
Evening Primrose Oil17952.9%
Vitamin K1191052.6%
Ashwagandha512651.0%

A form-specific search is narrower than a search for the parent mineral, and that is the point: what a label names is often not what the research tested. The forms guide explains what differs between salt forms.

For contrast: the most consistently studied

SubstancePairsPairs with zero recordsShare
SAMe1700.0%
Alcohol6611.5%
Turmeric/Curcumin3525.7%
Selenium1616.2%
Vitamin E3126.5%
Calcium8067.5%
Potassium7568.0%
Warfarin3638.3%

The other end

The most studied pairs.

At the other extreme, a few mineral and vitamin pairs have thousands of records, mostly because they share absorption pathways that nutrition science has studied for decades. Linked pairs have an evidence page.

Most PubMed records

PairRecords
Copper and Zinc11,384
Iron and Zinc6,680
Beta-Carotene and Vitamin A6,503
Copper and Iron6,380
EGCG (Epigallocatechin Gallate) and Green Tea Extract4,755
Iron and Manganese3,491
Calcium and Iron3,332
Calcium and Zinc3,325
L-Arginine and L-Lysine3,262
Alcohol and Cannabis (THC-Dominant)3,172
Manganese and Zinc2,851
Vitamin B12 and Vitamin B92,522
Elderberry Zinc Lozenges and Selenium2,069
Selenium and Zinc2,068
L-Glutathione and Selenium2,027

Method

How the search worked.

Every number on this page can be reproduced from the CSV, which includes the exact PubMed query used for each pair.

Search

  • Source: PubMed, via the NCBI E-utilities API, harvested on 2026-08-01.
  • Each substance was searched under its name and common synonyms (for example 5-HTP and 5-hydroxytryptophan).
  • A record counts for a pair when both names appear in the title, or when both appear in the title or abstract together with an interaction, co-administration or pharmacokinetic term. Bare co-mention was rejected in testing: it matched hundreds of papers that were about something else.
  • Study design comes from PubMed publication types and MeSH tags (Humans, Animals). No design was inferred by NutriStack.
  • The pair list is the NutriStack database: 2,517 pairs of supplements, and of supplements with prescription medicines, that users commonly combine.

Limitations

  • PubMed is not the whole literature. Work that is not indexed there, or that phrases the combination differently, is missed.
  • A record naming both substances is not evidence of an interaction, or of its absence. Zero records means the combination is under-studied, not that it is safe.
  • Combination products (for example zinc lozenges with elderberry) were searched under their ingredients' names, so they can share a count with the base pair.
  • Design counts are only complete for pairs with 20 or fewer records.
  • This report makes no claim about any specific combination. Questions about your own medicines belong with your pharmacist or prescriber.

Reuse and citation

The data is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Please cite: Williams B, Gassen D. The supplement evidence gap, 2026. NutriStack. https://nutristackapp.com/reports/evidence-gap

Download the full table (CSV, one row per pair)

Why this matters

Few studies means you have to keep your own records.

When the literature is thin, the best information about how a routine is going is your own. NutriStack is a free iPhone app for logging what you take and when.

NutriStack is an informational and organizational tool, not a medical service, and not a substitute for professional advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before starting, stopping, or changing any supplement or medication.